Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Dennis Endt <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges
- Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:43:41 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; b=rYHjneAN/4ZJ4nvfbpmtJp2UYA1C2+wNS9klFY5IleWQRs5DKlG+mhXmm5/lBZJyqp iMhRSOTcma0o9bN4/7a85c6NA2BNqkDtYj+zRtcHwswzhG3ZGCtt4L8ugzWvv3x/5+0z oB9rD571M79iFK0b4I9m+UG0OJ3dnCdo4eTfY=
Here is a Screenshot of that waht CGAL returns.
And here are the points to that fassade:
2585709.716 5703009.266 3.0
2585710.5465 5703008.192 8.0
2585711.377 5703007.118 3.0
2585711.377 5703007.118 0.0
2585709.716 5703009.266 0.0
That not the only case where CGAL returns a wrong number of edges or facets.
What have I to do to get a clean triangulation?
Best,
Dennis
Dennis Endt schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I`ve a problem with the 3D Delaunay Triangulation. I want to triangulate
> buildings with multiple fassades. Ech fassade contains of a certain
> number of vertices.
>
> That`s my code:
> #include <CGAL/Simple_cartesian.h>
> #include <CGAL/Filtered_kernel.h>
> #include <CGAL/Delaunay_triangulation_3.h>
>
> typedef CGAL::Simple_cartesian<double> SK;
> typedef CGAL::Filtered_kernel<SK> FK;
> struct K : public FK {};
> typedef K::Point_3 Point_3;
> typedef K::Triangle_3 Triangle_3;
> typedef CGAL::Delaunay_triangulation_3<K> Triangulation;
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> Triangulation T..... // the Triangulation object of my current fassade
>
> for(Triangulation::Finite_edges_iterator ie = T.finite_edges_begin(); ie
> != T.finite_edges_end(); ie++)
> {
> // The problem is, that the number of infinite_edges is too high.
> For example the number of vertices is 5, he gives me 9 edges or 4 and he
> gives me 6 edges.
> }
>
> Why does he gives me so a large number of edges? I would expect 7 or 5
> so far. What can I do, about to get a clean and good triangulation of
> each of my fassades?
>
> Best,
> Dennis
>
- [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Manuel Caroli, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Manuel Caroli, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Nico Kruithof, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Manuel Caroli, 11/02/2008
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.