CGAL users discussion list

["Benjamin schwarz" <>]

Hello Nico,

    and thanks for the answer.

> point, the algorithm was extremely fast, but also used a lot of
> memory. How much memory do you have? In the latest public release
> there is a better tradeoff between cpu times and memory consumption.

for a 28 atoms molecule, with the "good" insertion order I have times
in accordance with those you give in the cgal manual : 0.7s for the
third subdivision.

For a 1600 atoms protein, two subdivisions are OK, but the third one
induces my computer to swap and lagg, and ultimately I have to kill
the process. I only have 1Go mem and run greedy softs in the meantime
(Eclipse, firefox). Anyway, two subdivisions are enough for me at the
moment, and since you said the memory management is best in the newer
versions...

> In the meantime I switched to industry and have a deadline on tuesday. 
> After that I'll have a look. At one
Good luck with that.

Let me know if you can't reproduce the problem with the includes order.

    cheers

    --Ben