Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - [cgal-discuss] comparing C++ compilers on CGAL

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

[cgal-discuss] comparing C++ compilers on CGAL


Chronological Thread 
  • From: W Randolph Franklin <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [cgal-discuss] comparing C++ compilers on CGAL
  • Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:13:02 -0400

I implement my geometry ideas in C++, and am interested in performance.

So, based on CGAL's experience on various C++ compilers on linux, does
any compiler stand out, in performance, features, hidden gotchas, etc?

Useful compiler performance comparisons seem remarkedly hard to find
(though someone will probably send me some excellent cites that I'd
overlooked).

My sense is that g++ and icpp are now comparable. I've seen little
benefit from optimization above -O1 on either compiler.

An example of a gotcha: at one time, g++ (but not gcc!) implemented the
'read' routine, intended to read a block in one operation, as a loop
calling getc, with the expected impact on i/o performance.

Thanks.

W. Randolph Franklin, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page