coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jean-Francois Monin <jeanfrancois.monin AT rd.francetelecom.com>
- To: Judicael Courant <Judicael.Courant AT lri.fr>
- Cc: Jean-Francois Monin <jeanfrancois.monin AT rd.francetelecom.com>, Pierre Courtieu <Pierre.Courtieu AT sophia.inria.fr>, coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:39:07 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
OK, but what is the point to enforce normalisation in an inconsistent
context? One of the main uses of normalisation is to ensure
consistency.
Best,
JF
> If you add an inconsistent axiom such as
>
> Axiom wf : (x:A)(accessible x).
>
> and if you remove the head-constructor condition for the decreasing
> argument, then you can build terms that have no normal form:
> (f a (wf a)) here.
- [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments, Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Randy Pollack
- lRe: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Eduardo Gimenez
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Jean-Francois Monin
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments, Jean-Francois Monin
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Jean-Francois Monin
- lRe: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Eduardo Gimenez
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Judicael Courant
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments, Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments, Benjamin Werner
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments, Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Judicael Courant
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Randy Pollack
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Nicolas Magaud
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Venanzio Capretta
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments, Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Venanzio Capretta
- Re: [Coq-Club] relevance of evaluating accessibility arguments,
Pierre Courtieu
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.