Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety


chronological Thread 
  • From: Jason Hickey <jyh AT cs.caltech.edu>
  • To: Jean-Christophe Filliatre <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre AT lri.fr>
  • Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety
  • Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:19:24 -0800
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
  • Organization: Caltech

Jean-Christophe Filliatre wrote:

In  the Coq  architecture, the  correctness is  ensured at  the kernel
level,  once  the  proof  is  completed.   To  be  more  precise,  the
validation above will build the proof  term once the proof is done and
this proof term will be type-checked by the kernel.

My apologies, I had been thinking in terms of type theories where membership is undecidable...

In Coq, it really doesn't matter how tactics or validations work. All that matters is, by hook or by crook, one finds a proof term. In the end, the only thing that matters is that the type checker is correct. Many thanks for answering me Jean-Christophe!

Jason

--
Jason Hickey                  http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~jyh
Caltech Computer Science      Tel: 626-395-6568 FAX: 626-792-4257




Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page