coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jason Hickey <jyh AT cs.caltech.edu>
- To: Jean-Christophe Filliatre <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre AT lri.fr>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:19:24 -0800
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
- Organization: Caltech
Jean-Christophe Filliatre wrote:
In the Coq architecture, the correctness is ensured at the kernel
level, once the proof is completed. To be more precise, the
validation above will build the proof term once the proof is done and
this proof term will be type-checked by the kernel.
My apologies, I had been thinking in terms of type theories where membership is undecidable...
In Coq, it really doesn't matter how tactics or validations work. All that matters is, by hook or by crook, one finds a proof term. In the end, the only thing that matters is that the type checker is correct. Many thanks for answering me Jean-Christophe!
Jason
--
Jason Hickey http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~jyh
Caltech Computer Science Tel: 626-395-6568 FAX: 626-792-4257
- [Coq-Club] Type safety, Jason Hickey
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety,
Jean-Christophe Filliatre
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety,
Jason Hickey
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety, Jason Hickey
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety,
Jason Hickey
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type safety,
Jean-Christophe Filliatre
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.