coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "Kouskoulas, Yanni A." <Yanni.Kouskoulas AT jhuapl.edu>
- To: Matej Kosik <kosik AT fiit.stuba.sk>, "coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr" <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: RE: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:55:53 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
> One of the trivial cases whose description was left out from the book is
> this:
> s = Prop
> s' = s'' = Set
>
> E,$B&#(B |- A:Prop E,$B&#(B::(a:A) |- B:Set
> ----------------------------------
> E,$B&#(B |- $B"O(Ba:A,B:Set
Hi. The types of partial functions depend on this triplet, i.e. in
forall n:nat, [0<n -> nat]
the bracketed part uses it, see p 94 in the text.
Also, this triplet is very useful for making strongly specified functions
that return values along with certificates or guarantees about the data they
hold. The sig type is an example, see p. 252; its constructor has the type
forall (A:Set) (P:A->Prop) (x:A), [P x -> sig A P]
again the bracketed part depends on this rule.
-Yanni
- [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule,
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule, Frederic Blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule, Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule, Cody Roux
- RE: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule, Kouskoulas, Yanni A.
- Re: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule, Yves Bertot
- Re: [Coq-Club] A question concerning certain variant of the Prod rule,
Edsko de Vries
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.