coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?
chronological Thread
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT hcoop.net>
- To: Jeff Terrell <jeff AT kc.com>
- Cc: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:09:19 -0500
Jeff Terrell wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a prototypical implementation of Coq that would allow f to pass the guardedness checker?
There is a simple design pattern to overcome this limitation: represent your lists as functions over an appropriate index domain. See Section 8.4 of CPDT (http://adam.chlipala.net/cpdt/).
I suggested a concrete solution on coq-club when more or less the same question was asked a few months ago. I didn't find the thread in a cursory search, but you might have more luck.
- [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?, Jeff Terrell
- Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?, AUGER
- Message not available
- Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?,
Jeff Terrell
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?, Chris Dams
- Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?, Adam Chlipala
- Message not available
- Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?,
Jeff Terrell
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.