Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?


chronological Thread 
  • From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT hcoop.net>
  • To: Jeff Terrell <jeff AT kc.com>
  • Cc: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Type-Based Guardednees Checking] Re: [Coq-Club] Is Coq being too conservative?
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:09:19 -0500

Jeff Terrell wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a prototypical implementation of Coq that would allow f to pass the guardedness checker?

There is a simple design pattern to overcome this limitation: represent your lists as functions over an appropriate index domain. See Section 8.4 of CPDT (http://adam.chlipala.net/cpdt/).

I suggested a concrete solution on coq-club when more or less the same question was asked a few months ago. I didn't find the thread in a cursory search, but you might have more luck.



Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page