Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?


chronological Thread 
  • From: Victor Porton <porton AT narod.ru>
  • To: Andrej Bauer <andrej.bauer AT andrej.com>, Coq <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?
  • Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:25:57 +0400
  • Envelope-from: porton AT yandex.ru

04.11.2011, 01:22, "Andrej Bauer" 
<andrej.bauer AT andrej.com>:
>> šBut what if I want to write "supremum S == supremum T"? (to add more 
>> complexity, the first and the second supremum may be taken on different 
>> sets.)
>
> You coudl write for example as
>
> šššexists x, supremum S x /\ supremum T x

It is bad to introduce an extra variable.

> But if you have a lot of suprema and you work with complete posets,
> then it might be better to formalize complete posets with an actual
> operation "sup", so you could just write "sup S = sup T".

The trouble is that I work with arbitrary (non-complete) posets.

If I worked with complete posets only, there would be no problem.

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org



Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page