coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- To: Enrico Tassi <enrico.tassi AT inria.fr>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:56:04 -0400
On 03/11/2013 06:56 AM, Enrico Tassi wrote:
The admit tactic is just implemented as "case daemon" where daemon is
an Axiom of False. Again no side effects (no axiom injected into the
environment by the tactic).
From the department of unintended consequences...
This approach makes it harder to use [Print Assumptions] to take stock of the assumptions a proof depends on.
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 03/09/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/09/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Enrico Tassi, 03/09/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Enrico Tassi, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Pierre Courtieu, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Arnaud Spiwack, 03/11/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Enrico Tassi, 03/11/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/11/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Enrico Tassi, 03/11/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Arnaud Spiwack, 03/11/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/11/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Pierre Courtieu, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Enrico Tassi, 03/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Adam Chlipala, 03/10/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.