Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonathan Leivent <jonikelee AT gmail.com>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?
  • Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:29:41 -0500


On 01/24/2015 02:43 AM, Jason Gross wrote:
Hi,

In trunk/8.5, is there a tactical that means "progresses in at least one
goal"? I tried `progress [> intros ]`, but this fails if any of the goals
has no hypotheses to introduce, and I want it to fail only if all of the
goals have no hypotheses to introduce.

Thanks,
Jason


I learned recently from Arnaud, by way of bug 3878, that attempting to keep a global focus in tactic expressions is very difficult. None of the tacticals - progress, once, try, etc.. - will keep a global focus. Hence 'progress [> intros ..]' is equivalent to '[> progress intros..]'.

-- Jonathan




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page