Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
  • To: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:48:30 +0000

A built-in [any] tactical lets you easily build [gprogress] (and many others) in ltac, while otherwise a dedicated [gprogress]-like tactic written in ocaml is needed for each tactic you want to have a global version of.


On 8:37am, Mon, Jan 26, 2015 Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr> wrote:
I'd rather have a built-in any tactical than a global progress tactical.

 What difference do you make?




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page