coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?

From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
To: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:48:30 +0000

A built-in [any] tactical lets you easily build [gprogress] (and many others) in ltac, while otherwise a dedicated [gprogress]-like tactic written in ocaml is needed for each tactic you want to have a global version of.

On 8:37am, Mon, Jan 26, 2015 Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr> wrote:

I'd rather have a built-in any tactical than a global progress tactical.

What difference do you make?

Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/24/2015
  - Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/24/2015
    - Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/24/2015
      - Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 01/25/2015
        
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/25/2015
      - Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jason Gross, 01/25/2015
        
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/25/2015
        
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/26/2015
        
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/26/2015
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/26/2015
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jason Gross, 01/26/2015
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/26/2015
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/26/2015
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/26/2015
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jason Gross, 01/26/2015
        Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/26/2015