Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Pierre-Marie Pédrot <pierre-marie.pedrot AT inria.fr>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] gprogress tactical?
  • Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 00:53:26 +0100

On 24/01/2015 22:38, Jonathan Leivent wrote:
> [Requesting a fix to this will result in some Coq developer informing
> you that Tactic Notation is an abomination.]

Me, most probably. And indeed, this is an abomination. It does not hurt
to remind it to the face of the earth.

That said though, I do have future plans to try to fix the tactic
notation mechanism, making it true notations (and thus breaking all
hackish code relying on it, you've been warned). But that's a long-term
task...

Anyway, I recommend the use of ML-level tactics in this case instead of
ugly hacks, now that in 8.5 the former were tweaked to respect the
module scoping system.

PMP


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page