Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Is it possible to rewrite under binders?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Is it possible to rewrite under binders?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonathan Leivent <jonikelee AT gmail.com>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Is it possible to rewrite under binders?
  • Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:36:24 -0500
  • Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=jonikelee AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=jonikelee AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-qg0-f42.google.com
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:j9Iq1RYWFKY5Yq4UEagzVSD/LSx+4OfEezUN459isYplN5qZpc+zbnLW6fgltlLVR4KTs6sC0LqJ9fi6EjNfqb+681k8M7V0HycfjssXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aJBzzOEJPK/jvHcaK1oLsh7/0o8eYPFoArQH+SI0xBS3+lR/WuMgSjNkqAYcK4TyNnEF1ff9Lz3hjP1OZkkW0zM6x+Jl+73YY4Kp5pIYTGZn9Kq8/VPlTCCksG2Ez/szi8xfZHiWV4X5JcGIQmwZICg6NyBz7QJr3rmOutO172SqXOcD7Zb8xUDWmqaxsTUm72288Kzcl/TSP2YRLh6VBrUf5qg==



On 01/27/2016 03:39 AM, Thorsten Altenkirch wrote:
Indeed you need functional extensionality which isn’t provable in coq.
Imho this is a bug, but one which isn’t easy to fix.

Why would it be considered a bug? It is always possible to add the functional extensionality axiom to Coq when needed. And, without it, one can express concepts such as that two functions of the same type where one sorts lists in O(N^2) time and the other in O(NlogN) time are not identical.

Maybe this just indicates a difference in Coq usage between software developers and type theorists. Although Curry-Howard says we should correspond ;)

-- Jonathan




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page