coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: scott constable <sdconsta AT syr.edu>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:51:55 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=sdconsta AT syr.edu; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=sdconsta AT syr.edu; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT smtp1.syr.edu
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:lnKyXBzwKibrRvXXCy+O+j09IxM/srCxBDY+r6Qd0ekTIJqq85mqBkHD//Il1AaPBtWKrasawLuP+4nbGkU+or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6anHS+4HYoFwnlMkItf6KuSt+U1pr8hrn60qaQSjsLrQL1Wal1IhSyoFeZnegtqqwmFJwMzADUqGBDYeVcyDAgD1uSmxHh+pX4p8Y7oGwD884mosVHSODxe7kyZb1eFjUvdW4vt+PxshyWVgCI+mdUWWIQiQZBCQzIpEXhUpz2tDDmv8JmyTPcMMHrG+NnEQ++5rtmHUe7wBwMMCQ0pTna
Hi All,
I have the following definition of composition:
Inductive Compose : T → V → Prop :=
| comp_intro : ∀ x y z, R1 x y → R2 y z → Compose x z.
Notation "P ∘ R" := (Compose R P) (at level 55, right associativity).
And I am hopelessly lost as to how to prove this theorem:
Lemma compose_assoc : ∀ (R : U → V → Prop) (Q : V → T → Prop)
(P : T → W → Prop), P ∘ Q ∘ R = (P ∘ Q) ∘ R.
I have the following definition of composition:
Inductive Compose : T → V → Prop :=
| comp_intro : ∀ x y z, R1 x y → R2 y z → Compose x z.
Notation "P ∘ R" := (Compose R P) (at level 55, right associativity).
And I am hopelessly lost as to how to prove this theorem:
Lemma compose_assoc : ∀ (R : U → V → Prop) (Q : V → T → Prop)
(P : T → W → Prop), P ∘ Q ∘ R = (P ∘ Q) ∘ R.
Any help would be extremely appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
~Scott Constable
- [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Frédéric Blanqui, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Fabian Kunze, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Cyprien Mangin, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Cyprien Mangin, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Thorsten Altenkirch, 05/12/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Cyprien Mangin, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Fabian Kunze, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, scott constable, 05/11/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Prove associativity of composition of relations, Frédéric Blanqui, 05/11/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.