Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonathan Leivent <jonikelee AT gmail.com>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?
  • Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:47:36 -0400
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=jonikelee AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=jonikelee AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-qk0-f177.google.com
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:qCRXyxN6T5hr6HHAt3El6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIMzox0KPj6rarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsKIVzbuO+Pm4BSQp2tWojjMrSNR0TRgLiMEbzUQLIfWuLgnFFsPsdDEwB89YVVVorDmROElRH9viNRWJ+iXhpQAbFhi3DwdpPOO9QteU1JTmkbHqsMSLP01hv3mUX/BbFF2OtwLft80b08NJC50a7V/3mEZOYPlc3mhyJFiezF7W78a0+4N/oWwL46pyv50IbaKvdKMhCLdcET4OMmYv5cStuwOQYxGI4y4+VWMfjhpBBUDh4RDkU5Ht+n/4sex82ySeMMDeQrU9WDDk5KBuHky7wBwbPiI0pTmEwvd7i7hW9Uqs

Could PG be made to show multiple complete goals if the goal window is big enough? I know there are various ways to ask for one or more goals to be shown, but this question is whether it is possible to do this automatically based on the size of the goal window.

How about having a separate goal window for the current goal vs for the others?

How about having a way to automatically show non-focused goals, as via Show Existentials, in a separate window?

How about having a way to hide hypotheses based on type, or based on their being depended on in other hyps? True - the current multiple-hyps-per-line is very nice, but it would be really nice if what I see in the goals window is just what I need to see (subject to choices) and room is not taken up by unimportant or redundant info. Set Hyps Limit isn't discriminating. Maybe have the goal window just show some tool-tip-able small icon to show where some invisible hyps are in the context?


How about a real-time extraction window? This was started, but not completed. I think the last time I checked there were issues on the Coq side in that what it was sending was a non-optimized extraction - what the window showed was much larger/complex than what would be extracted via the Extraction command when the definition was finished.


-- Jonathan




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page