coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern
Chronological Thread
- From: Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:38:17 +0200
On 07/09/2016 16:13, Soegtrop, Michael wrote:
> Dear Guillaume,
>
>> Coq just checks that this is true for all the branches of the "match"; if
>> so, it assumes that it is also true for the "match" itself.
>
> Sorry, I don't get it. That is what I assumed Coq does until I saw your
> example, but how does Coq check that (in my example below ) the branch term
> "1" has type "bool"?
Coq does not check that 1 is of type bool; it checks that 1 is of type
nat. It is "match H ..." that is of type bool. Let me state it again.
1. "match H with" is matching a term H whose type is in the inductive
type family "eq nat", since H has type "eq nat bool".
2. The match signature is "in (eq _ t) return t", so Coq checks that 1
(which is returned in the branch matching "@eq_refl nat" of type "eq nat
nat") has type nat.
3. All the branches are well-typed, so "match H with ..." is of type
bool since H is of type "eq nat bool" and the signature is "in (eq _ t)
return t".
Best regards,
Guillaume
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Matthieu Sozeau, 09/06/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent, 09/06/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent, 09/06/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/06/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent, 09/06/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/06/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/07/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/07/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/07/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/07/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Gaetan Gilbert, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/07/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/08/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent, 09/08/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/08/2016
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/07/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent, 09/06/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Matthieu Sozeau, 09/06/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.