coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- 1993
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 1994
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 1997
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
2016/09
181 mails
Chronological Thread << < page # 2/7 > >>
- 16/09/06
- [Coq-Club] The Coq Package Index is online!, Maxime Dénès
- Re: [Coq-Club] The Coq Package Index is online!, Enrico Tassi
- Re: [Coq-Club] The Coq Package Index is online!, Gabriel Scherer
- [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Matthieu Sozeau
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jason Gross
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- 16/09/07
- [Coq-Club] Second call for papers: JFLA 2017, Sylvain Salvati
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Matthieu Sozeau
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Gaetan Gilbert
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Jonathan Leivent
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- [Coq-Club] Proof General with XML protocol, available for testing, Paul A. Steckler
- [Coq-Club] any down side to making all definitions Instances?, Jonathan Leivent
- Re: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Guillaume Melquiond
- 16/09/08
- Re: [Coq-Club] help with automating derived UIP_refl proofs, Dominique Larchey-Wendling
- RE: [Coq-Club] Getting "computing" proof terms with dependent types / reduction of matches with single pattern, Soegtrop, Michael
- Re: [Coq-Club] any down side to making all definitions Instances?, Théo Zimmermann
- [Coq-Club] GCAI 2016 - Call for Participation, Geoff Sutcliffe
- Re: [Coq-Club] any down side to making all definitions Instances?, Jonathan Leivent
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.