Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Paul Leyland <paul.leyland@gmail.com>
- To: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:51:39 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
I'm running the latest git repository version of CADO-NFS on a c147 and
was wondering why I never had enough relations. As I'm a complete newby
I may genuinely not have enough, but I also have lines like this in
purge.log
pcl@maat ~/cado-nfs/test $ cat tmp/c147.purge.log
/home/pcl/cado-nfs-1.1/build/maat/filter/purge.ra55366a
-poly ./tmp//c147.poly -keep 160 -nrels 38129246
-out ./tmp//c147.purged.gz -npthr 2x2 -basepath ./tmp/
-subdirlist ./tmp//c147.subdirlist -filelist ./tmp//c147.filelist
Warning: unused command-line parameter npthr
Usage: purge [options] -poly polyfile -out purgedfile -nrels nnn
[-basepath <path>] [-subdirlist <sl>] [-filelist <fl>] file1 ... filen
Options:
-excess nnn - initial excess (default 1.01)
-keep nnn - prune if excess > nnn (default 160)
-minpa nnn - purge alg. primes >= nnn (default alim)
-minpr nnn - purge rat. primes >= nnn (default rlim)
-nprimes nnn - expected number of prime ideals
-sos sosfile - to keep track of the renumbering
-raw - output relations in CADO format
Should I be worried?
Should I let the run continue or should I interrupt it and try to
recover somehow?
Right now there are "Info:Running total: 47706267 relations." which is
plausibly large enough to complete the factorization.
The factorization was started with
../cadofactor.pl params=../params/params.c147 wdir=./tmp/ name=c147 n=`cat
num.n`
and, of course, num.n contains a single line containing 147 decimal digits
Thanks,
Paul
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/04/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Cyril Bouvier, 04/04/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/04/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/04/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/05/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/05/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/06/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/08/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/10/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/06/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/05/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Cyril Bouvier, 04/04/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.