Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:34:40 +0100
- Organization: GeometryFactory
I think if you proceed like this, since the algorithm is incremental, you can end up with tetrahedra marked that are no longer degenerated.
I think the method Laurent proposed you is the best.
Sebastien.
On 03/19/2013 09:07 AM, Philipp Blanke wrote:
Hello!
I'd like to construct a Delaunay complex for a point set that contains
several degenerate cases, i. e., >4 cospherical points. The doc says
that the Delaunay_triangulation_3 code solves the local disambiguity by
using a perturbation scheme.
If the tetrahedra that were constructed using this scheme would be
marked, I could merge them in a preprocessing step to get a Delaunay
complex consisting of convex polyhedra.
Where in the code is the perturbation scheme used to select a possible
tetrahedrization? I did not find this.
Best regards,
Philipp
- [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Philipp Blanke, 03/19/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/19/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Philipp Blanke, 03/19/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/19/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Monique Teillaud, 03/19/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Philipp Blanke, 03/19/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Monique Teillaud, 03/19/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay complex, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/19/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.