Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Olivier Devillers <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:28:16 +0200
|
Le 10/16/13 3:12 PM, mytien a écrit :
Still I am not close to the performance in the manual. Do you think the randomness of my data is the problem here?As Andreas said, the NON randomness of your data is the problem. --
Olivier Devillers, chercheur à |
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, (continued)
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.