Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Olivier Devillers <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:45:38 +0200
If you really want to compute the Delaunay triangulation of integers in [0,2000], then you do not really need the CGAL management of robustness issues: If you use 64 bits integers for your coordinates, computation should be exact (in sphere test for integers on d bits require 5d+5 bits=60 bits in your case). When 5 points are co-spherical, you avoid an expensive certification of this fact. It remains a bit costly, because you still have many cases where more than 4 points are cospherical, and some special work has to be done to deal with such situations. Another solution is to keep your coordinates in double and actually perturb them (add a random value in [0 , 0.00001] to each coordinate) --
Olivier Devillers, chercheur à |
- [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/15/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Monique Teillaud, 10/15/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Monique Teillaud, 10/15/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.