Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Olivier Devillers <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3
  • Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:54:34 +0200

Le 10/17/13 2:50 PM, mytien a écrit :
I am not very sure if I understand you correctly, but do you basically say
that points that shape curved features are generally bad for delaunay
triangulation?


Yes, if you have 1D curve features and you sample them densely,
then it is probably bed for the size of the Delaunay triangulation
(it can depends of the axact shape of the features).

If you sample (more or less regularly) 2D features it is usually ok.

--
Olivier Devillers, chercheur à

PNG image




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page