Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Olivier Devillers <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:54:34 +0200
Le 10/17/13 2:50 PM, mytien a écrit :
I am not very sure if I understand you correctly, but do you basically say that points that shape curved features are generally bad for delaunay triangulation?Yes, if you have 1D curve features and you sample them densely, then it is probably bed for the size of the Delaunay triangulation (it can depends of the axact shape of the features). If you sample (more or less regularly) 2D features it is usually ok. -- Olivier Devillers, chercheur à
|
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, (continued)
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.