Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: mytien <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 05:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
I am not very sure if I understand you correctly, but do you basically say
that points that shape curved features are generally bad for delaunay
triangulation?
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Performance-of-Triangulation-3-tp4658201p4658234.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, (continued)
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/16/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/17/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Performance of Triangulation_3, mytien, 10/16/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.