Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
[cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?
Chronological Thread
- From: tdchen <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:46:48 -0500 (CDT)
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Fail ; spf=Pass
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
I'm a newbie both to STL and CGAL.
I found that the CGAL surface_mash_simplification might be very helpful to
my work.
But I have to change it a little to suit my needs.
Specifically, I want to change the placement policy to that: the border edge
will be collapsed to one of its vertices and others to the Lindstrom-Turk
position.
I wonder if it is convenient in CGAL.
It seems there is no such a placement policy in curent version of CGAL.
Thanx.
--
Sent from: http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/
- [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/13/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/14/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Shrabani Ghosh, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 10/16/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Shrabani Ghosh, 10/23/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 10/16/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/14/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.