Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?
Chronological Thread
- From: tdchen <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:36:49 -0500 (CDT)
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Fail ; spf=Pass
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:LwGEUx0JANrhhaaJsmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8ZsewfLfad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG9mCsLQb0KGP7OjJYi8p2d65qncMcZhBBVcuqP49uEgeOvODElDxN/XwbiY3T4xoXV5h+GynYwAOQJ6tL1LdrWev4jEMBx7xKRR6JvjvGo7Vks+7y/2+94fcbglVijexe7F/IRu5oQnMtMQdnJdvJLs2xhbVuHVDZv5YxXlvJVKdnhb84tm/8Zt++ClOuPwv6tBNX7zic6s3UbJXAjImM3so5MLwrhnMURGP5noHXWoIlBdDHhXI4wv7Xpf1tSv6q/Z91SyHNsD4Ubw4RTKv5LptRRT1iikIKiQ5/XnZhMJwkqxVoxCupxJizYHbfI6bO+Fzfr/fcN8GWWZNQtpdWzJHD4ihb4UPFe0BPeNAoonhulQBsRu+CheqBOjyzTJEm2H60bA63ug8EQzL3hIsEtMSvHnPtdX1Lb0eXvyyzKnN1DjOae5d1zn66IjNaB8hoPeMUKp2ccXL0kYgDAfFgUuKpYP5ODOV0+IAuHWY4ep4Te+jlmoqpgVrrjWhxcogkIrEi4MPxl3F9Ch0xps+K8eiR05he9GkFYNdtyGEOItyRcMvW2dotSkgxr0Ao5G0ZzMFyJA5yBLFd/OHdI2I7griVOaXPzh4mGpodK+7ihu260StxO7xWtO33VtLtCZIk9jBumgI1xPJ68iHTvV9/l2m2TaKzw3f9/9ILV00mKbGK5MswKA8m5sPvUnYBy/2gV/6g7ORdkUh4uSo8fjoYq36pp+AMI95kh3xMqs0lcy7GOg3LwkOX3OH9uShz73j5lb0QK5Kj/0ziqnWqorWJcUdpq6jAg9ayJwv6xilD2Tu7NNNlnYOKBdJeQmMkpPyE1DIOvHxS/ml0Hq2lzI+2/zNPrDnSsGUdCGeyeq+J+glw1dFjgE0yIYMtNpvFrgdLaerCQfKv9vCA0phalHm86PcENx4k7gmdyePD6ueaf6AtwPO4OslKe2BIoQSvWSkcql317vVlXY83GQlU+ys1JoTZmq/G6Q0Olzfan3p0ItYTTU6+zEmRemvs2WsFCZJbibgRrt67TY+Wtqr
Thank you so much MaelRL for the so detailed suggestion!
I will try the way you guided me, but it will spend me some time.
There is a difference on my mesh border that:
It is composed of some(usually 4)polylines, and I have to ensure the joint
ends not to be removed.
So I think I have to send some extra message to the mesh as the vertex
property.
Is it right?
And if 2 ends of an edge are both on the border(border edge), I want to
collapse it to the end with lower cost.
I think I can call the cost function in my placement function to make
decision, can't I?
Thank you again.
--
Sent from: http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/
- [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/13/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/14/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Shrabani Ghosh, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 10/16/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Shrabani Ghosh, 10/23/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 10/16/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/14/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.