Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?
Chronological Thread
- From: Mael <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:37:32 +0200
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=None ; spf=None
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hello,
With CGAL, you can pass any policy you want as long as it fits
some requirements. The requirements on a placement class is very
light and is defined there: https://doc.cgal.org/5.0/Surface_mesh_simplification/classGetPlacement.html.
thus, your class must provide the functor:
boost::optional< Point > operator() (Profile const &edge_profile) const
The "edge profile" is a class that regroups all information
useful during the collapse of an edge. Its interface is described
there: https://doc.cgal.org/5.0/Surface_mesh_simplification/classEdgeProfile.html.
In particular, you see that you can obtain the edge being collapse
via v0_v1
(or v1_v0, since these are halfedges). You can use the function
is_border_edge (https://doc.cgal.org/5.0/BGL/group__PkgBGLHelperFct.html#ga63695419c5ce7f68949ff2fb4f42d733)
to know if your edge is on the border (check out https://doc.cgal.org/5.0/BGL/index.html
for details on the graph API).
You can then simply derive a new policy from Lindstrom-Turk and do something like:
struct my_custom_placement
: public lindstorm-turk placement
{
boost::optional< Point > operator()
(Profile const &edge_profile) const
{
if(is_border_edge(edge_profile.v0_v1()))
return whichever extremity point you want;
else
return base::operator()(edge_profile);
}
};
Best,
Mael
I'm a newbie both to STL and CGAL. I found that the CGAL surface_mash_simplification might be very helpful to my work. But I have to change it a little to suit my needs. Specifically, I want to change the placement policy to that: the border edge will be collapsed to one of its vertices and others to the Lindstrom-Turk position. I wonder if it is convenient in CGAL. It seems there is no such a placement policy in curent version of CGAL. Thanx. -- Sent from: http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/
- [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/13/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/14/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Shrabani Ghosh, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 10/16/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Shrabani Ghosh, 10/23/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 10/16/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, tdchen, 10/15/2019
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Is it convenient to change the surface_mesh_simplification a little?, Mael, 10/14/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.