coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Keiko Nakata <keiko AT kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop
- Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:36:02 +0900 (JST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
A bit of follow-up (not essential to understand my previous post):
Since the two worlds, namely the completeness proof and the necessity
of the algebraic laws, which are for the application of the logic, do
not interact, I have Set-valued logic for the completeness and
Prop-valued one for using the logic. Two logics have exactly the same
rules, but I cannot prove them equivalent, of course. I thought that
it would be nicer if I can merge them.
Keiko
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Taral
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.