Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop


chronological Thread 
  • From: Keiko Nakata <keiko AT kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
  • To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop
  • Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:36:02 +0900 (JST)
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

A bit of follow-up (not essential to understand my previous post):

Since the two worlds, namely the completeness proof and the necessity
of the algebraic laws, which are for the application of the logic, do
not interact, I have Set-valued logic for the completeness and
Prop-valued one for using the logic.  Two logics have exactly the same
rules, but I cannot prove them equivalent, of course. I thought that
it would be nicer if I can merge them.

Keiko





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page