coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Keiko Nakata <keiko AT kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- To: taralx AT gmail.com
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:29:55 +0900 (JST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Thanks for the explanation (to Adam as well).
I hit this problem in an attempt to use Prop as impredicative Set.
Having learned that the use of Set-valued nat confused me,
I wonder if I can avoid them.
Namely, is there a Prop-valued equivalent to nat and Z?
Best,
Keiko
- [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Taral
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] case & inversion, Set & Prop,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.