coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Robbert Krebbers <robbertkrebbers AT student.ru.nl>
- To: "Brian E. Aydemir" <baydemir AT cis.upenn.edu>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Meta theory: induction over terms with abstract variables
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:23:57 +0200
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi,
Brian E. Aydemir wrote:
I've encountered this problem before [1], and as far as I know, Adam's suggestion is the way to go. For the sake of concreteness, I've included below code that implements the basic idea.Thanks for the help, your answers really helped me out!
Cheers,
Brian
[1] A non-bug report involving lists and a separate inductive type:
http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/coq/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1751
I just read the bug report you mentioned, but I'm still wondering why it isn't allowed. Is it possible to create a 'badly defined' function this way? If so I would be interested in an example (which Yves believed exists, but wasn't able to show in that thread).
Cheers,
Robbert
- [Coq-Club] Meta theory: induction over terms with abstract variables, Robbert Krebbers
- Re: [Coq-Club] Meta theory: induction over terms with abstract variables, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Meta theory: induction over terms with abstract variables,
Brian E. Aydemir
- Re: [Coq-Club] Meta theory: induction over terms with abstract variables, Robbert Krebbers
- Re: [Coq-Club] Meta theory: induction over terms with abstract variables, Hugo Herbelin
- [Coq-Club] More nested fixpoint difficulties.,
roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] More nested fixpoint difficulties., Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.