coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Daniel Schepler <dschepler AT gmail.com>
- To: roconnor AT theorem.ca
- Cc: Carlos Simpson <Carlos.Simpson AT unice.fr>, Victor Porton <porton AT narod.ru>, Thorsten Altenkirch <txa AT cs.nott.ac.uk>, coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] quotients
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:55:04 -0800
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:28 AM, <roconnor AT theorem.ca> wrote:
I'm not sure why Schepler suggested that he only used the
Ensembles.Extensionality axiom. This doesn't appear to be the case to me. I may be misunderstanding something here.
OK, so maybe I didn't enumerate all the necessary axioms. I was just going from memory and identifying what seemed to me (subjectively) to be the most "objectionable" axioms that I used in that file. Although, I still considered it to fall short of fully classical reasoning -- it can construct quotients just fine within the sheaves/topos model of type theory.
--
Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] I'm against setoids and pro ZF, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] I'm against setoids and pro ZF,
roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients, Andrew Cave
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients, roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients, Bas Spitters
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients, Peter Vincent Homeier
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients, Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] quotients,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] I'm against setoids and pro ZF, Michael Shulman
- Re: [Coq-Club] I'm against setoids and pro ZF,
roconnor
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.