coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Matthieu Sozeau <mattam AT mattam.org>
- To: Jacques-Henri Jourdan <jacques-henri.jourdan AT inria.fr>
- Cc: Maxime Dénès <mail AT maximedenes.fr>, "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 13:07:47 +0000
Tr is not a recursive subterm of u here. The initial exemple relies on the fact that there is no recursive subterm to consider, ie the condition is vacuously true.
Le vendredi 13 décembre 2013, Jacques-Henri Jourdan a écrit :
I tried to adapt this example to find an example were there is no need to match over False. However, the guard conditions forbids me:
Inductive True2 : Prop :=
I2 : True -> True2.
Hypothesis Heq : True = True2.
Fixpoint contradiction (u : True2) : False :=
match u with I2 Tr =>
contradiction (match Heq in (_ = T) return T with eq_refl => Tr end)
end.
So, what happens in this case ? Does this check be extended to make Coq reject the other construction ?
--
JH Jourdan
----- Mail original -----
> De: "Maxime Dénès" <mail AT maximedenes.fr>
> À: coq-club AT inria.fr
> Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Décembre 2013 22:41:18
> Objet: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Arthur and I refined Daniel's example to show that Propositional
> Extensionality (even the weaker version of it) as defined in Coq's
> standard library is inconsistent in Coq's current theory:
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Require Import ClassicalFacts.
>
> Section func_unit_discr.
>
> Hypothesis Heq : (False -> False) = True.
>
> Fixpoint contradiction (u : True) : False :=
> contradiction (
> match Heq in (_ = T) return T with
> | eq_refl => fun f:False => match f with end
> end
> ).
>
> End func_unit_discr.
>
> Lemma foo : provable_prop_extensionality -> False.
> Proof.
> intro; apply contradiction.
> apply H.
> trivial.
> trivial.
> Qed.
>
> Print Assumptions foo.
>
> Print provable_prop_extensionality.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> (Typechecked with Coq 8.4pl2).
>
> Was that fact known?
>
> Maxime.
>
--
-- Matthieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Pierre Boutillier, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Christine Paulin, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Andreas Abel, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Maxime Dénès, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Anthony Bordg, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Guillaume Brunerie, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Arnaud Spiwack, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Matthieu Sozeau, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 12/13/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, AUGER Cédric, 12/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Maxime Dénès, 12/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Christine Paulin, 12/15/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Arthur Azevedo de Amorim, 12/20/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Christine Paulin, 12/20/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Arthur Azevedo de Amorim, 12/20/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Propositional extensionality is inconsistent in Coq, Christine Paulin, 12/16/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.