Accéder au contenu.
Menu Sympa

starpu-devel - Re: [Starpu-devel] Failed assert in copy_driver.c

Objet : Developers list for StarPU

Archives de la liste

Re: [Starpu-devel] Failed assert in copy_driver.c


Chronologique Discussions 
  • From: Xavier Lacoste <xl64100@gmail.com>
  • To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
  • Cc: starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] Failed assert in copy_driver.c
  • Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:26:34 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel/>
  • List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>

Hello,

With changing MAX_PENDING_REQUESTS_PER_NODE and
MAX_PENDING_PREFETCH_REQUESTS_PER_NODE. I got:
oops in copy_data_1_to_1_generic (datawizard/copy_driver.c:200)... 4:
unspecified launch failure

With revision 13658 I got:
oops in _starpu_driver_test_request_completion
(datawizard/copy_driver.c:729)... 4: unspecified launch failure

I'll go to 1.1 and see.

Thanks,

XL.

Le 20 oct. 2014 à 14:11, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> a
écrit :

> Xavier Lacoste, le Mon 20 Oct 2014 13:56:08 +0200, a écrit :
>> I could use 1.1, the only thing I use from 1.2 are the commutable tasks
>> but in my code. The use of this feature does not change much the timing of
>> the execution, so I can go 1.1...
>> it's just because I used 1.2 on an other machine (when I tested the
>> removal of sequential consistency flag on often used buffers) and wanted
>> the same configuration.
>
> OK :)
>
> Samuel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail




Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Haut de le page