CGAL users discussion list

Le Mer 7 mars 2007 20:15, Iosif Pinelis a écrit :
> Come on Camille. Your own example, from your latest post, shows that
> CGAL does not give the right answer.

In my message, I explicitely mention
"in the case of non flat polygons, we can assume that three successive
vertices are never aligned (by removing unnecessary vertices)"
This is where CGAL fails.

> How does one prove that something is
> _not_ a proof?

As for the rest of your message, I think it has nothing to do on such a
mailing-list.
-- 
Camille Wormser