Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Matthijs Sypkens Smit <>
- To: CGAL <>
- Subject: triangulations with genus > 0
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:47:35 +0200
Hi all,
It seems that the CGAL Triangulation_3 does not support holes. When I build
such a triangulation by manipulation the data_structure "by hand", then
the validity check on the data structure fails with "Euler relation
unsatisfied". I guess that could be expected since the manual mentions how
the triangulation is actually a covering of the 4D sphere.
Can anyone comment on the problems of using the CGAL Triangulation for
genus > 0 objects? It is at least possible to traverse the object. Could I
disable the check for conformity to the Euler relation and have something
workable, or would I be bound to run into troubles along the road?
If so, are there plans to support such triangulations in the future?
--
Matthijs Sypkens Smit
- triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/18/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Sylvain Pion, 10/18/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Andreas Fabri, 10/18/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Monique . Teillaud, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Laurent Rineau, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Laurent Rineau, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Monique . Teillaud, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Monique . Teillaud, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Laurent Rineau, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Sylvain Pion, 10/18/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.