Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Matthijs Sypkens Smit <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0
  • Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:12:15 +0200

On Monday 22 October 2007 13:51,

wrote:
> Dear Matthijs,
>
> I am not sure I understand what you need. Which kind of objects are you
> trying to triangulate?
> The data structure is in fact able to store more than a triangulation of
> the sphere in 4D. We are re-using it for storing the triangulation of a
> torus in 4D (3D periodic space).
> Do you need triangulations with boundaries? The CGAL triangulations have
> some properties, like for instance the fact that each facet is common to
> two tetrahedra. So, no boundaries.

Dear Monique,

I want to use the CGAL to inspect/traverse and maybe manipulate the
triangulations of 3D higher genus objects. These triangulations are likely
to originate from other sources and are built into a CGAL triangulation by
my own code. I suspected that it would be possible to also work with
triangulations of higher genus objects with the data structure, but I
concluded that there are no guarantees, since the is_valid() method
returns false in that case. That is why I asked what kind of problems I
can expect. As Andreas pointed out, there are indeed class-methods, such
as locate(), that rely on certain assumptions (effectively, that the model
is convex, I believe), thus some caution is called for. I hope this
clarifies my original question sufficiently.


--
Matthijs Sypkens Smit



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page