Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Sylvain Pion <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:51:29 +0200
- Organization: INRIA
Matthijs Sypkens Smit a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems that the CGAL Triangulation_3 does not support holes. When I build such a triangulation by manipulation the data_structure "by hand", then the validity check on the data structure fails with "Euler relation unsatisfied". I guess that could be expected since the manual mentions how the triangulation is actually a covering of the 4D sphere.
Can anyone comment on the problems of using the CGAL Triangulation for genus > 0 objects? It is at least possible to traverse the object. Could I disable the check for conformity to the Euler relation and have something workable, or would I be bound to run into troubles along the road?
Try it :-)
If so, are there plans to support such triangulations in the future?
Maybe. That said, if the only problem is the Euler check in is_valid(),
this could be easily workable (just pass the genus to is_valid).
--
Sylvain Pion
INRIA Sophia-Antipolis
Geometrica Project-Team
CGAL, http://cgal.org/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/18/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Sylvain Pion, 10/18/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Andreas Fabri, 10/18/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Monique . Teillaud, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Laurent Rineau, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Laurent Rineau, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Monique . Teillaud, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Monique . Teillaud, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Laurent Rineau, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Matthijs Sypkens Smit, 10/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] triangulations with genus > 0, Sylvain Pion, 10/18/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.