Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Dennis Endt <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:02:38 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jzjb0wL6/XwvQjDzShdcWwODsKgX1HALLVY4ThLyFrq1FLCykfbNBV4LqZ8t9ihdWR W+4iuQor6xb1m6zYGdFjAAjLddXjGLvq0AX/Z75femTZRh0PF1zo/TwUEvID7MeJRfoY yNdB03AjzQ3ncAMUGGWteBifn+0gCWqCqxy6M=
Monique Teillaud schrieb:
> If you are lucky (= your points really don't belong to a plane
> parallel to any xy,xz,yz plane), you will get the same triangulation
> three times, which is not what you want (I guess so). Yhen using one
> of these random traits should give you what you want.
> If you are less lucky, one of the computationa will crash. Then, use
> one of the other two.
> I'm afraid that's the best you can do if you don't know anything about
> your data, except the fact that they are almost coplanar.
>
> best,
> Monique Teillaud
Hi,
thanks so far for your help.
My last question is:
How can I check if a computational will crash? What is the best method
for this?
I tried to use is_valid(), but this didn`t worked. Is it enough to check
for the number_of_vertices != 0 of a fassade?
Best,
Dennis
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, (continued)
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Manuel Caroli, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Nico Kruithof, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Nico Kruithof, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Olivier Devillers, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/02/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Andreas Fabri, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Dennis Endt, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Bernd Gaertner, 11/03/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Delaunay Triangulation - number of edges, Monique Teillaud, 11/03/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.