CGAL users discussion list

[Kwok Jasper <>]

Thanks.

Thanks

I have tried again but still cannot return the triangulation with the short period of time.
May I ask if it is that it may be related to the memory that is left in the PC ?

Currently, I am using Window XP and I have about 4 GB left in the C drive.
May I ask if increasing the spaces in the C drive may be a possible way to increase the speed?

Thanks very much
 

---

From:
To:
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:24:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss]

The input points are from here
http://www.cse.ust.hk/~jamesjjx/bunny_final.pts

I tested your dataset with CGAL 3.4 on a 1.8 GHz Intel computer, it returns

"triangulation of 362272 points computed in 11.85 s". 

I tested it with CGAL 3.3 on the same computer, it returns

"triangulation of 362272 points computed in 12.21 s".

Did you forget to compile your code with optimizations turned on?

May I ask what may I do with the stack overflow ?

There is no point in repeating the same question over and over. We told you that the incident_XXX functions had been fixed for a stackoverflow problem in CGAL 3.4. If you do not want to update to 3.4, you can copy all incident_XXX functions (and related helper functions) from the 3.4 file to your file.

However, in the current case, the problem does not seem to come from CGAL. You should check your code and probably turn the optimizations on.

-- 

Camille

---

利用 Windows Live™ Photos 輕?分享相片。 簡易上載及分享照片