coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pit AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:54:24 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=clement.pit AT gmail.com; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=clement.pit AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mout.kundenserver.de
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:haW+yRQVG6ZqgfvOFWo7nic6C9psv+yvbD5Q0YIujvd0So/mwa64Zx2N2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4vimATJLsczJmUtBWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/mj6bqpdaDOU1hv3mUWftKNhK4rAHc5IE9oLBJDeIP8CbPuWZCYO9MxGlldhq5lhf44dqsrtY4q3wD86Fpy8kVWqLjOq88ULZwDTI8Mmlz6te4mwPESF6k4voZX2MKpSJJH02AxxXzQ5v8tmOuve5w3SScIYvuTKwcVjGr7qMtQxjt3nRUfwUl+X3a35QjxJlQpwis8kRy
👏 Thanks Pierre!
Should we enable this by default?
On 2016-06-23 11:47, Pierre Courtieu wrote:
> Done in trunk.
>
> (setq coq-prefer-top-of-conclusion t)
>
> should do it.
>
> Best,
> P.
>
> 2016-06-23 17:04 GMT+02:00 John Wiegley
> <johnw AT newartisans.com
>
> <mailto:johnw AT newartisans.com>>:
>
> >>>>> Pierre Courtieu
> <pierre.courtieu AT gmail.com
>
> <mailto:pierre.courtieu AT gmail.com>>
> writes:
>
> > When the goal is large, PG displays as much as possible of the goal,
> with an
> > order of precedence: - prefer conclusion over hyps (1) - prefer
> bottom of
> > the conclusion over its top (2)
> >
> > This is rather empirical setting. (1) is hardly questionable imho,
> but (2)
> > is indeed arbitrary. I can maybe have an option for (2).
>
> An option for (2) would be very helpful. I'm working with MIT's Fiat
> system,
> which involves proofs that refine monadic, non-deterministic blocks
> "action by
> action", from top to bottom, so knowing the bottom of the conclusion
> without
> seeing the top is relatively useless.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
> http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, John Wiegley, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jason Gross, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, John Wiegley, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/24/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/17/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.