coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pit AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:54:40 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=clement.pit AT gmail.com; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=clement.pit AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mout.kundenserver.de
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:HOSNgRd135eRMG/OKMitQKkWlGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc6+YR7h7PlgxGXEQZ/co6odzbGG4uaxACdfut6oizMrTt9lb1c9k8IYnggtUoauKHbQC7rUVRE8B9lIT1R//nu2YgB/Ecf6YEDO8DXptWZBUiv2OQc9HOnpAIma153xjLDjvcyKKFoTzBOGIppMbzyO5T3LsccXhYYwYo0Q8TDu5kVyRuJN2GlzLkiSlRuvru25/Zpk7jgC86l5r50IAu3GePEzSqUdBzA7OUg04tfqvF/NV1ih/HwZB04SEx9FBRTy1BDmG9LatiLnuud5kH2ROcDzQLYoHyyj849kTRbpjGEMMDtvozKfsdB5kK8O+EHpnBd42YOBOIw=
Ah, I see what you mean; thanks! I seems that I misread John's suggestion.
This would indeed be a very nice (and relatively easy, I think) improvement
to `coq-show-first-goal` in coq/coq.el.
Amusingly, I think Jonathan's specs are incomplete; what you describe does
fullfil 1 + 3, since 4 + 6 it doesn't say anything about what to do when the
first goal itself doesn't fit.
Clément.
On 2016-06-17 23:44, Jason Gross wrote:
> If it's a bug, then it's systematic; my experience is that PG aligns
> the bottom of the goals window with the bottom of the first goal,
> rather than preferring to align with the top when the goal is too big
> to fit in the buffer.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, 7:26 PM Clément Pit--Claudel
> <clement.pit AT gmail.com
>
> <mailto:clement.pit AT gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> On 2016-06-17 19:26, Jonathan Leivent wrote:
>> Here's a priority order of what I'd like to see without scrolling,
>> if the goal window is big enough: 1. all of the goals in focus,
>> with their hyps 2. all of the current goal, and as many of the next
>> goals as can fit completely, but at least all conclusions 3. the
>> whole current goal's conclusion, with as many hyps above it as fit
>
> I think 1 + 3 is the current behaviour (IIRC)
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/17/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Paul A. Steckler, 06/17/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/17/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Paul A. Steckler, 06/17/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/17/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/20/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, John Wiegley, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jason Gross, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, John Wiegley, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.