coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jonathan Leivent <jonikelee AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:51:45 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=jonikelee AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=jonikelee AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-qk0-f169.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:4CR5ORRFPfEH4RTMT9LBx35qUdpsv+yvbD5Q0YIujvd0So/mwa64ZxeN2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4vimATNLucvJmUtBWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/mj6bqpNaLPk1hv3mUWftKNhK4rAHc5IE9oLBJDeIP8CbPuWZCYO9MxGlldhq5lhf44dqsrtY4q3wD86Fpy8kVWqLjOq88ULZwDTI8Mmlz6te4mwPESF6t4X0VTmUflFJsDgnb4RfmFsPztS37ted51SSyMsj/TLRyUjOnufQ4ACT0gTsKYmZquFrcjdZ92fpW
On 06/23/2016 04:37 PM, Ralf Jung wrote:
Hi,
On 23.06.2016 22:27, Pierre Courtieu wrote:
I don't know, I think most of regular users's large goals are of the formWe frequently have goals where "P" is large. Usually that's an accident
...
======
P1 ->
P2 ->
...
Pn ->
P
and in this case isn't P what people want to see?
Well... At least ssreflect users may want this option set by defaut
since P1 is the "active" hypothesis.
;-) but for example, proving a Hoare triple about an interesting piece
of code can result in a pretty long goal of which only the beginning
(the expression in head position) is interesting. We are not using the
ssreflect proof style, and I can hardly imagine a case where we'd prefer
to see the end of the goal over its beginning.
So, I'd personally set coq-prefer-top-of-conclusion to t (thanks for
adding that!).
Kind regards,
Ralf
In a really long telescope, would it make sense to be able to see the beginning and the end, with the middle initially hidden?
Maybe another opportunity for hide-show? So that the goal would look like this initially:
======
P1 -> ... P
with the ability to show more info on the left by clicking?
-- Jonathan
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jason Gross, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/18/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, John Wiegley, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Pierre Courtieu, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/24/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Jonathan Leivent, 06/23/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 06/17/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Suggestions for Proof General?, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 06/17/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.