Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] When does the termination checker reduce a record accessor?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] When does the termination checker reduce a record accessor?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "William J. Bowman" <wjb AT williamjbowman.com>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] When does the termination checker reduce a record accessor?
  • Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:00:02 +0100
  • Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=wjb AT williamjbowman.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=wjb AT williamjbowman.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail.williamjbowman.com
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:jEh0Rh0foj1EHw3hsmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8ZsesQL/ad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG96Eu7QZ06L/iOPJZy8p2d65qncMcZhBBVcuqP49uEgeOvODElDxN/XwbiY3T4xoXV5h+GynYwAOQJ6tLw6annrn5jkLXx77KABdJ+LvG4eUgd7k+fq1/siZXARMgDu0ZPtQal2cqhrUv89cyd99KKwZ1RrNpnpBfuZcwnxtLFTVlBH5sJTjtKV/+jhd7qpyv/VLVr/3Kvw1

> On Nov 3, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Joachim Breitner
> <mail AT joachim-breitner.de>
> wrote:
>
> Without δ, why does it unfold `list_P` and `existsb` to see that the
> recursion on the list is nicely structural? And why do tree_P1 and
> tree_P2 still work even when I specify Opaque list_P.?
I was about to conjecture exactly what you discovered; thank you for digging
into the source. And the question you pose is most mysterious. Are some
definitions treated differently than others?


William J. Bowman




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page