Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Gilbert Bernstein <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:08:55 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: s=main; d=mail.utexas.edu; c=nofws; q=dns; h=Received:Received:Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To: References:Content-Type:Message-Id:From:Subject:Date: To:X-Mailer; b=YrwRTybPJloUOWMXnFNUc8jXtn9i/KzQnJGLB6xhFP2bFWgHEJQoR 5xfFMH/YQRlDo1BVcxhtincbge6+nG8foL8VgnpnXgxBlR9iOA3Cl 5cRlrMXgoNCfE5f55fR3FDBMOxikGG4MZ4LY5LcEwBLYxNCPyxros LlF30VSK5ub8=;
Sorry about getting back to you so much later on this. I finally got around to testing things out. I ran an octopus model through the conversion, which probably has self-intersections induced by mesh simplification. (I am not sure of this, however) complex construction gives me the following: Nef vertices: 1751 Nef edges: 5158 Nef facets: 3415 Nef volumes: 7 number of discarded facets: 0 The original unsimplified octopus model consisted of 4 simply connected components: the two eyes, the main body and some dealie on the bottom of the main body. I've attached the original off file, and conversion programs. The nef file was too large to politely post to the list, but should be easily regenerated. When attempting to convert back to a regular polyhedron to output to off the is_simple() test fails. Should I circumvent this test, or does it mean that there is definitely something wrong upstream? Thanks for any time you have, -- Gilbert |
Attachment:
octopus.off
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
nef2off.cpp
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
off2nef.cpp
Description: Binary data
(octopus model is simplified from version available on online repository http://shapes.aim-at-shape.net/ Please make sure to check there and acknowledge them appropriately if you use it) On Jan 9, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Peter Hachenberger wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 04:57 -0600, Gilbert Bernstein wrote:
I don't know this error, which is probably because I never use the filtered kernel (Homogeneous<leda_integer> is most efficient at the moment). But my first try know would be to look closer at the input file. Many off-files have features that are pretty hard to handle. There are facets intersecting one another, empty facets, etc. So, try to convert the off-file with the example program complex_construction. You might want to change it a bit in advance, because it does not output the result. This program will convert the off-file most likely and tell you whether there were problems with some facets. From that output and the resulting file you can find out whether there was something wrong with the off-file. Warning, this might take 10 minutes. Peter |
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, (continued)
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Peter Hachenberger, 01/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Peter Hachenberger, 01/08/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Peter Hachenberger, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Peter Hachenberger, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/20/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedra test cases, Gilbert Bernstein, 01/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.