coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: St�phane Lescuyer <stephane.lescuyer AT inria.fr>
- To: Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond AT inria.fr>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:59:50 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Q1T51SHxa5balLnou2vAhofaseVJFnYEhfTOwaVsRHv9t3u6bXGX1ilxq+TwV8DGE9 kgb3fraYLiNrtYpwkT/SAMLZ5Oz5wV0GPRYnXja3wL+91LsXjGSj0orDiVi44uajgWBJ INyPJF1EtEca5xWtQnFawZ0JZN72nsuT61azg=
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Guillaume Melquiond
<guillaume.melquiond AT inria.fr>
wrote:
> Stephane's solution is correct. I would just like to point that there is a
> better tactic than "destruct" for this kind of inductives:
>
> case mem_eq. (* No arguments! Coq infers them when using "case". *)
>
Good to know, indeed ! Any particular reason why destruct does not do
something similar ? Or does not accept holes, which would be
sufficient for that matter : destruct (mem_eq _ _) ?
Stéphane
--
I'm the kind of guy that until it happens, I won't worry about it. -
R.H. RoY05, MVP06
- [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction, Thomas Braibant
- Re: [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction,
Stéphane Lescuyer
- Re: [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction,
Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction, Stéphane Lescuyer
- Re: [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction,
Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction, Matthieu Sozeau
- [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2),
Vladimir Voevodsky
- Re: [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2), Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2),
Cody Roux
- Re: [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2),
Vladimir Voevodsky
- Re: [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2),
Cody Roux
- Re: [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2), Vladimir Voevodsky
- Re: [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2),
Cody Roux
- Re: [Coq-Club] an inductive types question (2),
Vladimir Voevodsky
- Re: [Coq-Club] A not so FSet specific question about destruction,
Stéphane Lescuyer
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.