Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Joachim Reichel <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:16:29 +0100
Hi
> No. Use "-fabi-version=1". :-)
yes, you are right. But I'm not sure how well this option is tested. I
haven't seen it being used in practice and I prefer recompiling rather
than using this option. I'd try that option only if recompiling is not
an option (no source, too tight integration with existing libraries (for
example Qt => OpenGL/GLU => X Server)).
Joachim
- CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Johan Nouvel, 02/20/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Joachim Reichel, 02/20/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Johan Nouvel, 02/21/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Joachim Reichel, 02/21/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Johan Nouvel, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Laurent Rineau, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Joachim Reichel, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Laurent Rineau, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Andreas Meyer, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Joachim Reichel, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Joachim Reichel, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Laurent Rineau, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Johan Nouvel, 02/22/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Joachim Reichel, 02/21/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Johan Nouvel, 02/21/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Joachim Reichel, 02/20/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Andreas Fabri, 02/20/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.2.1 and g++ 3.3.5, Johan Nouvel, 02/21/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.