coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- 1993
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 1994
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 1997
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
2017/01
121 mails
Chronological Thread << < page # 3/5 > >>
- 17/01/19
- [Coq-Club] Avoiding unnecessary universe variables when rewriting in Type, Ben Sherman
- Re: [Coq-Club] Avoiding unnecessary universe variables when rewriting in Type, Jason Gross
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Bruno Barras
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Théo Zimmermann
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Maxime Dénès
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Dominique Larchey-Wendling
- [Coq-Club] JAR Special Issue on Automated Reasoning Systems, Geoff Sutcliffe
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jonathan Leivent
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Théo Zimmermann
- [Coq-Club] anonymous inductives (was Re: Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?), Jonathan Leivent
- [Coq-Club] print types in let bindings, Abhishek Anand
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
- [Coq-Club] [CSF-attendees] DeepSpec Summer School, July 13-28, 2017 -- call for applications, Benjamin C. Pierce
- Re: [Coq-Club] [deepspec] [CSF-attendees] DeepSpec Summer School, July 13-28, 2017 -- call for applications, Reed Porada
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.