coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- 1993
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 1994
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 1997
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
2017/01
121 mails
Chronological Thread << < page # 3/5 > >>
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Guillaume Melquiond, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Guillaume Melquiond, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Théo Zimmermann, 01/18/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Théo Zimmermann, 01/18/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Bruno Barras, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jonathan Leivent, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Pierre Courtieu, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Théo Zimmermann, 01/19/2017
- [Coq-Club] anonymous inductives (was Re: Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?), Jonathan Leivent, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Dan Frumin, 01/20/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Pierre Courtieu, 01/20/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Hugo Herbelin, 01/19/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jason Gross, 01/20/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/21/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Jason Gross, 01/21/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why do we have "Prop < Set" ? Why not just "Prop ≤ Set" ?, Matej Kosik, 01/21/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.